Tuesday, December 31, 2019
Memo for Motion Against Summary Judgment Essay - 2002 Words
I. Introduction and Standard for Opposition to Summary Judgment Crowell Academy, Inc. and Arturo Gomez, (hereinafter, collectively Crowell) were grossly negligent and used willful misconduct in their responsibilities involving the fencing club. The bargaining power of Crowell was so grossly unequal so as to put Lajuana Barnett at the mercy of Crowells negligence. Lastly, the exculpatory clause contained in the release form (see release form) is void as against public policy. Consequently, under Maryland law, it is up to the trier of fact to determine if the exculpatory clause is unenforceable. As such, there is a dispute as to the genuine issue of material fact related to Crowells Answer, Crowell can be liable to Lajauna Barnettâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦The defendant did not ask whether the plaintiff was left or right handed, and the plaintiff, not knowing otherwise, put on her equipment the same way as she saw the other members of the club putting on their gear. A waiver of a right to sue is ineffective to shift the risk of a partys own willful, reckless, or gross conduct. Id. at 543 (citing Winterstein v. Wilcom, 16 Md.App. 130, 134-36, cert. denied, 266 Md.744 (1972)). In the present case, the defendant was certified by the U.S. Fencing Association to provide instruction in fencing and was to instruct fencing club members in the proper methods of fencing. These are direct quotes taken from the release form signed by the plaintiff. In signing the exculpatory clause, plaintiff was to release defendant from any and all claims arising out of students participation in fencing club activities. In return, plaintiff was to receive instruction in the proper methods of fencing. This includes proper instruction in putting on the safety equipment, arguably the most important aspect of the sport of fencing. The wording any and all claims can be construed as ambiguous. It would be against public policy to hold valid a claim that released the defendant from any and all claims arising out of fencing club activities, including claims arising from the defendants negligence. The plaintiff signed the exculpatory clause releasing the defendant fromShow MoreRelatedC ase Study : Sandhu V. Solutions 2 Go Inc Essay907 Words à |à 4 PagesGo announced the 2010 fiscal profit sharing plan bonus and paid its employees. Ms. Sandhu received no share of the profit sharing bonus, despite being employed for the entire fiscal year, which ended on March 31, 2010 so she filed for a motion for summary judgment. The full share for the employees who were employed for the entire 2010 fiscal year was $16,055. In December 2010, the company tried to make its employees to sign an employment contract in which if an employee received termination priorRead MoreContract Assignment1025 Words à |à 5 PagesFrom: Erin N To: Contracts Course grader Date: 12/13 Re: Assignment 1 MEMO FACTS Bernie lives in Richmond, VA and he decides on February 1 to advertise the sale of his 2006 Ford Fusion for $13,500 in the local newspaper. After several weeks and no offers he gets a call from Vivian on March 1st offering to purchase the car for $12,000. Bernie realizes he may not get any other offers and sets up to meet with Vivian on March 5th to complete the sale transaction. After the negotiationsRead Morework Essay1232 Words à |à 5 Pagesï » ¿PLEG 265 Capstone Project Part 2 Pre-litigation Research Memoà To: Maxine Ifill From: Paralegal, Sherrie Eustace Re: Sue Davis v. Gary Steele Date: September 12, 2013 ASSIGNMENT Review authorities provided to determine probable answers to the issues. FACTS Our client, Sue Davis, was in a car accident in Yankton, South Dakota. Sue sustained massive head injuries, and the paramedics did not think that she would make it to the hospital alive. Once all was said and done SueRead MoreOur Firm s Suit On Behalf Of Client Michael Ndichi Essay1593 Words à |à 7 PagesOur firmââ¬â¢s suit on behalf of client Michael Ndichi sets forth two arguments against the police. The first, a Constitutional argument, counters the policeââ¬â¢s anticipated qualified immunity defense in this suit, and the second, a psychological argument, argues that the police departmentââ¬â¢s policies left Officer Jensen ill-equipped to make good decisions. In this memo, I present Constitutional and psychological evidence to undergird each of these arguments. As an initial matter, we must be prepared toRead MoreJewelry Has A Strong Case Against Jennifer Lawson1777 Words à |à 8 PagesMemo Introduction In paper, Greeneââ¬â¢s Jewelry has a strong case against Jennifer Lawson because Jennifer breached the confidentiality agreements that she signed with Greeneââ¬â¢s Jewelry. In the agreement, it specifically indicated that Jennifer could never disclose any information regarding ââ¬Å"Ever-Goldâ⬠creating process, which is patented and owned by Greeneââ¬â¢s Jewelry. Jennifer not only stole a draft letter that contains the details of creating Ever-Gold but also took it to Greeneââ¬â¢s competitor HowellRead MoreCasefile Method - Answer to Casefile 1.12674 Words à |à 11 PagesMEMORANDUM 03.01.2010 TO: FROM: RE: Daphne Matthews Alex Associate - 4667 Memo Assignment 1: Who Does the Pastry? I. Introduction Collins was hired as Head Chef at the Marrimount Hotel and believed that this job came with the inherent authority to choose his assistant chefs, even though nothing of this was mentioned in the contract for employment. Therefore, when Crest, owner of the Marrimount, attempted to determine Collins s assistants, Collins quit his job and went to work for the TreadwellRead MoreInternship Final Paper : Internship4944 Words à |à 20 Pagessuppliers payment report, and sent those invoices to the major companyââ¬â¢s clients like JCPenny, Target, Ebags, Luggagepros etc. Most of my time was utilized in making all the credit reports for the customers and prospects of the company. I used to make summaries of the financial reports of the companies. And I went through the companiesââ¬â¢ balance sheets and income statements as what and how there is difference between the reports issued through QuickBooks and SAP. During the second week of internship, I gotRead MoreEssay on Apollo Shoes Case33718 Words à |à 135 Pagesfrom the engagement partner (Arnold Anderson), the engagement manager (Darlene Wardlaw), an intern (Bradley Crumpler) assigned to do the ââ¬Å"grunt workâ⬠, and the director of Apolloââ¬â¢s internal audit department (Karina Ramirez). Required assignments and memos are in bold print. The solutions manual highlights the assignments at the beginning of each section and provides highlights and teaching tips for each section. The information is sequential in nature. In other words, the students must pay closeRead MoreCorporation (Fisch) Outline Penn Law Essay62808 Words à |à 252 Pagesencumber its assets without Cargillââ¬â¢s permission; consent by Cargill was required before Warren would be allowed to declare a dividend or sell or purchase stock). Warren quickly fell into debt under Cargillââ¬â¢s management. Ps (farmers) brought action against Cargill and Warren, alleging that Cargill was jointly liable for Warrenââ¬â¢s indebtedness as it had acted as a principal for the grain elevator. ââ" ª Issue: Whether Cargill, by its course of dealing with Warren, became liable as a principalRead MoreNetflix Case Study Analysis7552 Words à |à 31 Pages$200à million per year.[32] As of 2011, Netflix s Watch Instantly service holds first-run rights to films fromà Paramount Pictures,à MGM,à Lions Gate Entertainmentà (through an output deal withà Epix), along with films fromà Sony Pictures,à Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group,à Overture Films,à Anchor Bay Entertainmentà (through an output deal withà Starz).[citation needed]à In addition, Netflix holds rights to back-catalog titles to films fromà Time Warner,Universal Pictures,à Sony Pictures,à Paramount Pictures
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.